Beadles at War with Washoe County - Inside the Election Lawsuit From Hell

Topic: Elections

I have held nothing back when it comes to my opinion of our corrupt courts, and how disgusting it is that they continue to throw back valid cases that offer glimpses of hope that we may one day fix our third world system of elections.  We have had good cases all the way back to Texas v. Pennsylvania, filed while President Trump was still in office, which came from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office and alleged that Pennsylvania’s miscarriage of its own election laws disenfranchised Texas’s 38 electors.  The suit was joined by 20 other states and thrown out of the U.S. Supreme Court for lack of standing.

Tyrants in black robes have continued their activities with utter disregard for addressing a serious national crisis.  Abraham Hamadeh, Mark Finchem, and Kari Lake have found this out the hard way, though Lake’s courage and persistence in seeing her cases through to trial far beyond the recommendations of the professional political consulting class have unearthed hard proof of election engineering and malfeasance we previously had no idea was occurring.  Though unsuccessful in reversing the wrong outcomes, Lake’s efforts have proven not only her character – but that we were right all along.

I have detailed many of these filings in past posts, but today I will introduce you to Beadles v. Rodriguez, et al., filed on August 4, 2023, in Nevada’s 2^nd Judicial District Court in Washoe County.  I have known Beadles, an investing genius and self-made man, for close to two years, and have collaborated with him on multiple projects.  He and his team of analysts are second to none in terms of competency and brainpower and cannot be dissuaded from pursuing justice.

The suit is filed against Jamie Rodriguez, Washoe County Registrar of Voters, Eric Brown, Washoe County Manager, Alexis Hill, Chairwoman of the Washoe County Board of Commissioners, Washoe County itself, Defendants Does I through X, and Roe Corporations I through X.  The Does and Roes are described as defendants that committed “acts, activities, misconduct, or omissions which make them jointly and severally liable under the claims for relief...”

Beadles, on pages 5 and 6, describes grievances with the defendants that include usual suspects like “unclean and grossly inaccurate voter rolls,” “unsecure voting systems,” “failure to train staff and election officials,” and “telling staff not to verify signatures.”  The defendants are rightly described as being unprepared to run the 2024 presidential primary in any competent fashion unless compelled to do so by court of law.  To further complicate matters, the defendants have failed to respond to any of Beadles’ three previous petitions, filed beginning on November 18, 2022.

The failure of defendants to respond to the petitions has caused them to violate their oaths of office and commit other offenses, such as violating Beadles’ constitutional rights, all while they continue to maintain corrupt voter rolls and administer what I would describe as nothing surpassing a quasi-election in terms of overall quality, as outlined in the excerpt below:

On page 9, Beadles makes the severity of these infractions undeniably clear:

The disregard of legal obligations by the Defendants will contribute to a more generalized erosion of the rule of law, encouraging further acts of disobedience by other public servants without the accountability this Court can and must impose.  If public officials are not held accountable for their actions, citizens will fear that their freedoms and rights are not adequately protected, leading to a sense of insecurity and potential suppression of those rights.  If left unchecked, if there is no accountability, public officials can act with impunity.  By this court not acting affirmatively to correct the ills before it will set a dangerous precedent, paving the way for more widespread infringement of civil liberties.

Below, Beadles makes the case for perjury and betrayal of the public trusts afforded by the holding of said offices.  His requested relief is to have the Court order the Defendants to respond to his three previous petitions.

While the relief requested above may seem overly diplomatic, things heat up for Beadles’ second cause of action, which calls for the removal of the defendants from for violating their oaths and abdicating their right duties with regard to positions held.

Beadles, representing himself pro se, requests many items as relief that are core staples of legitimate election integrity reform:

You can read the full original complaint here.

BACKGROUND INFO

Washoe and Clark Counties in Nevada, making up the Reno and Las Vegas metropolitan areas, respectively, contribute 7 out of every 8 votes statewide, and take advantage of every loophole and bylaw to squeak out narrow victories for establishment candidates, regardless of party.  The Heritage Foundation ranks Nevada 50^th in Election Integrity, and while I have a slightly different opinion, they clearly rank near the bottom of the pile in the Silver State.

After the 2020 “election,” Beadles planned to write a pamphlet for fixing our national election crisis in the mold of his Great (many times over) Uncle, Benjamin Franklin, but decided to become the man in the arena himself and show the world how to get the job done.  Electronic and physical canvassing with close friends and election integrity allies Bobby Piton and Roger Fuller revealed Washoe County’s voter rolls to have error rates of 38-42% consistently, depending on sample being analyzed.  I’ve shown how that works out in practice.  Beadles’ team, including Edward Solomon, identified an algorithm at play overseeing elections in Clark and Washoe, but not in the remaining 16 county equivalents.  Hoping for the best with local government and law enforcement, Beadles was instead attacked in the press and credited with being an election denier and conspiracy theorist.

Beadles launched a legal sting operation involving nearly 2,000 people, catching county workers breaking nearly every election law and court orders allowing for observation.  No action was taken when these infractions were brought to light.  Beadles has sued Governor Joe Lombardo for signing Nevada Senate Bill 406 into law, which makes it a felony to threaten, harass, or intimidate election workers (but guess who gets to decide what constitutes and offense?).

Beadles had the following to say regarding his case:

In this lawsuit, we show how the defendants violated their oaths of office, failed to adhere to their duties, show they broke almost every election law and my court orders. I additionally show how the races were stolen via algorithm and show how a 4th grader can use the County's own certified data for themselves to determine, not predict, the outcomes of the elections. It conclusively shows that no matter how many votes a candidate gets, the algorithm is predetermined to make sure their candidate always wins by a predetermined percentage. Meaning if Seth is to win by 51%, no matter if you get 100 or 1,000 or a trillion votes, you always win by 51%. I expose the AB321 scam, mailing ballots to everyone, how it's rigged, but more importantly, I show how they violate every law, starting with voter rolls, to counting the votes in secret. This is how they rig all elections; we prove it here, we prove it everywhere. The remedies I seek are what the county commissioners can give us, which would be to clean voter rolls, start from scratch, no more counting or voting machines, vote and report in each precinct, and 30 other remedies safeguarding our elections. For same-day voting, ending the mass mailing of votes, voter ID, etc., I have to do in Supreme Court or legislature. This is the first part, where we save 85% of our elections just by the power of the court and county commission. If we do this here, people in every county can do it without having to beg the crooks in the legislature to save our elections; this will save it enough so we can get those bums out.

Current status of the case:

· 8/4/23 filed a new State Lawsuit - See original Complaint, also 4 exhibits.

· 8/4/23 filed motion to request Chief Judge Simons.

· 8/9 filed 2nd motion to request Judge Simons.

· 8/9 filed Exhibits in supplement to the original complaint, 117 exhibits.

· 8/10 filed motion to assign judge.

· 8/10 filed peremptory challenge of the assigned judge.

· 8/13 filed motion to compel the court to issue citations to defendants.

· 8/13 filed a change of venue.

· 8/15 filed motion to recuse judge.

· 8/24 filed response in support of issuing citations.

· 8/24 filed response in support of the motion to change venues.

· 8/24 filed additional exhibits, bringing to 145 exhibits submitted.

· 8/29 filed opposition to motion to dismiss.

Conclusion

Beadles has a magnificent case, and I will share which exhibits he gives me permission to show when I am allowed, and when such revelations will not harm his case.  If relief is granted, this will be a landmark case that may bring about sweeping reform regarding election integrity and crack the whip on public officials who refuse to address this nation-threatening subject.

Please follow Robert Beadles’ work at Operation Sunlight.