Precinct Mapping Project - Insights from Arizona and Capabilities Moving Forward

Topic: Elections

When an outsider thinks Arizona, he or she usually thinks Phoenix, or maybe the Grand Canyon.  When the topic is election integrity, the Grand Canyon goes out the window, and Maricopa County assumes its proper role as the omnipresent evil empire that has corrupted a once-promising political atmosphere for an emerging populist coalition known as America First.  Every now and then, people will turn an eye to Pima County, home to metro Tucson, which alone appears to have contributed more than five times the certified margin between Joe Biden and Donald Trump in Arizona with its own fraudulent votes.

I take light-hearted ribbing from some of my social media following about having once said that Maricopa and Pima Counties together contribute “seven-ninths” of the vote, or otherwise stated as seven out of every nine votes, in the state; therefore, two-ninths of the vote comes from the 13 outlying counties, with Pinal, Yavapai, and Mohave Counties, all strongly Republican and Trump-trending, rounding out the top five in terms of votes cast.  The remaining 10 counties contributed 10.7% of the vote, just shy of one-ninth of the statewide vote in 2020.

Where am I going with this?  I am making the case for the necessity of my Precinct Mapping Project and giving you real life examples that are critical for unraveling the election crisis in America.  Arizona’s 11 electoral votes could be easily flipped to Donald Trump even if we ignore the rampant chaos in the state’s two largest counties (Maricopa and Pima).  My select assessments follow:

Estimated excess Biden vote totals (10,457 vote margin between Biden and Trump statewide)

Pinal – 10,106

Yavapai – 9,602

Coconino – 9,198

Mohave – 9,831

Cochise – 7,232

Navajo – 7,383

Yuma – 5,210

Apache – 4,293

Gila – 2,443

La Paz – 736

Graham – 1,034

Santa Cruz – 1,138

Greenlee – 182

Total – 68,388

68,388 votes represent more than six times the margin between Trump and Biden statewide, without even sniffing the two biggest cesspools of corruption.  All 13 of those counties, with the lone exception of Coconino, were on a Republican registration trend heading into the 2020 quasi-election, but only 7 delivered a Trump margin improvement (increased margin of victory or decreased margin of defeat) despite Trump having the requisite number of net new votes gained to trend all 13 in his favor, including Coconino, home to metro Flagstaff and the University of Northern Arizona, as well as a sizeable Native American vote.

Statewide Precinct Map

Here are some damning examples my precinct mapping, brilliantly illustrated by Mississippian Jeff Pedigo, demonstrates:

Example 1 – San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation

Gila and Graham Counties

The viewer can clearly see the junction of Precinct 410 in Gila County and Precinct 16 in Graham County in the statewide map and perceive the symmetry of the borders above.

As previously documented in this journal:

Gila and Graham Counties are both Trump landslides and given the magnitude of fraud found in the Maricopa, Pima, Coconino, Mohave, and other elections statewide, have relatively low fraudulent totals.  What is unique about these two counties, however, is that they both share the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation.

Trump 1.0 (2016) was not popular with Native Americans – in many places, he was less popular than Mitt Romney, and that is saying something.

Here is how the GOP nominees did in Precinct 410 (San Carlos) in Gila County in 2012 and 2016:

Romney 138

Obama 1,014

-

Trump 123

Clinton 945

Trump is nearly 3 points better off because Obama is no longer atop the ticket.  Trump loses by “just” 822 votes, compared to Romney’s loss margin of 876 votes.  The good news for Trump is that he will go up to 260 votes in 2020, with a limited population to pull from and a huge GOP registration surge in Gila County itself. With gains like that, I would expect a margin of defeat of less than 600 votes.

Trump 260

Biden 1,265

Margin of defeat is back up to 1,005, far worse than Obama did to Romney.

Here is how the GOP nominees did in the Graham County side of the reservation (Precinct 16 – Peridot):

Romney 34

Obama 345

Trump 40

Clinton 349

Trump improves by six points because he has a slight uptick in votes, while Clinton is stagnant to Obama as a percentage.  Imagine if Trump can more than double his own vote total in 2020.

Trump 88

Biden 471

Even affording the same gain as Clinton (not likely with such a large Trump gain in a limited population), Biden has 118 excess votes.  With perhaps 415 excess votes in Gila County and 118 in Graham, Biden has what appears to be a minimum of 533 fraudulent votes in the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation between two blowout counties, approximately five percent of the margin between Trump and Biden in the state in places no one looks.

Example 2 – Red Butte Precinct

Navajo County

Along Arizona’s northern border with Utah sits Navajo County Precinct 1, Red Butte.  It is a wipeout Democrat precinct on the Navajo Nation reservation that Donald Trump managed to have trend 8.9% in his direction, though the trend was not a function of his gains, which didn’t happen, but rather that of Hillary Clinton’s loss of 190 of Barack Obama’s 2012 votes.

The viewer can see in the screenshot above that Trump gained 75.5% in total votes, a raw gain of 449 votes on top of just 595 total from 2016, when the county trended nearly nine points in his favor when he lost votes from Romney’s 2012 column.  It is clear many Obama-Clinton voters would have abandoned the Democrats to vote for Trump in 2020, suggesting Clinton’s total of 4,455 would plummet to about 4,000, or even fewer, which would improve Trump’s standing by nearly 1,000 votes in this precinct alone from 2016.

Instead, Joe Biden, who did not campaign in Arizona, managed to defy the trend in the precinct and Trump’s massive vote gain to trend Red Butte 5.4% in his favor, adding 2,045 votes to Clinton, and dwarfing Obama’s blowout performance.

I believe there are at least 2,500 fraudulent Biden votes in this one precinct, suggesting (like in the previous example) massive voter roll corruption and ballot harvesting operations occurring out of sight and out of mind on the many reservations in Arizona.  If I am correct, this one precinct accounts for nearly one-quarter of the certified margin between Biden and Trump in Arizona.

Example 3 – Whetstone

Cochise County

Cochise County and “Captain K” have a storied history together.  I spent two separate military schooling stints at Fort Huachuca, once in 2008-09 as a Second Lieutenant, and again in 2011-12 as a Captain.  This county is also home to my friend and trusted advisor, retired Master Sergeant Fernando “Jack” Dona.  Just up the road from the base and adjacent Sierra Vista lies the crossroads of highways AZ-90 and AZ-82, and the barren census-designated place known as Whetstone, population 3,236.

As you can see by the graphic above, President Trump took what was already a nearly 3:1 precinct (Precinct 46 – Whetstone) and trended it another 4.1% in his direction with only a modest gain of 45 votes over Romney, which, when given the trend and loss of Democrat support for Clinton, resulted in the opposing column dropping by 55 votes.  That, when combined with Trump’s gain, swung exactly 100 votes in total margin.

In 2020, President Trump blew out an enormous gain of 273 votes in a precinct that had trended four points in his direction and lost Democrat support the year before.  The population of the precinct and the political trend suggest a Biden vote total at or below 300 votes, with 300 votes representing what I would call an absolute best-case scenario for Biden.

Biden managed to come up with a net gain of 171 votes, trending the precinct four points away from Trump despite what appears to be an epic sandblasting of the Democrat Party’s hopes in an area that has all but forgotten they exist.  Trump won the precinct by 102 more votes than he did in 2016, but Biden had at least 201 more votes in this precinct than all supporting data suggest is possible.  This allows for population-dense areas to have less to make up and appear less obvious in defrauding the overall vote.

The elections in Cochise County were so clean (sarcasm intended), in fact, that Elections Director Lisa Marra resigned to go work for cartel lawyer and dubiously “elected” Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes rather than be accountable to county residents.

Conclusion

I could spend an entire week outlining serious anomalies, inconsistencies, and outright corruption that can be gleaned from simple deep dives on precinct-level mapping that, when considered together, back up my assessment of a Trump margin of no less than 11.5% in a legitimate Arizona 2020 presidential election.

By now, you should see there is serious value in my Precinct Mapping Project, which is in full swing, and will hopefully yield valuable actionable intelligence that will aid in increasing legitimate votes for our candidates and decreasing fictitious votes for unscrupulous ones.  Thus far, Arizona and Pennsylvania are complete, Florida is fully sponsored, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Washington are partially sponsored, and several select counties around the nation are covered.  This will be my capstone project, in addition to my various appearances and functions, for the duration of this election cycle.

Author’s Note: If you see the value in this project and would like to sponsor a state or select counties, contact me at skeshel@protonmail.com – I will respond as soon as I receive your message.  Please note I plan to limit dissemination of information from this point forward to those sponsoring the work, and grassroots teams in the various states or counties – and this is for obvious reasons.  Another good way to sponsor this work is to become a paying member of this journal, which features “paid” content approximately two times per week.  Thank you!