12 Comments
User's avatar
Jeff Hotchkin's avatar

This is exciting! Can’t wait to see who lines up in opposition to common sense reforms, particularly the RINO’s.

Expand full comment
ModelYManiac's avatar

Ugh. My sense is that a simple parallel hand count of a paper ballot printed and verified before the voter's eyes (or an absentee) would create a huge problem for machines rigging the outcomes.

Am I wrong? Why is a foolproof PARALLEL method - required - not the most critical component of the solution? Just creating a verifiable ballot is meaningless if it is only ever "counted" by the machines.

Assuming we cannot get rid of the machines, which should have been the bedrock . . . If Congress could for the machines on us, Congress could also remove them.

Expand full comment
Mickey Splaine's avatar

It sounds like DOGE is going to look at state voter rolls...I bet a federal judge rules against this before you finish your analysis!

Expand full comment
ModelYManiac's avatar

That would be nice. One would imagine Elon's team would be interested in the algorithms to be found in those. Question is, how to keep anything in place on election rolls? They can remove millions of "fake voters" only to put them back on for election day, then remove them again the day after. And if algorithms can be done to insert and find fake voters, they can likely cover up log files or other means to track changes. A whole new system needs to be created . . .

Expand full comment
Jeff Lane's avatar

Let’s hope paper ballots are mandatory and computer voting machines are outlawed. Also, in states like Arizona where the Secretary of State oversees elections, when the SOS is overseeing her own election for Governor — Katie Hobbs — the SOS must step aside and let another state official or bipartisan committee oversee the ballot counting. Common sense needs to be the rule going forward!

Expand full comment
MY's avatar

Thanks for getting this out so quickly! Still praying for you to be called to serve our dear President in order to make this EO a reality! I'm sure it's only a matter of time.

One thing, tho ... Better check your sources, I believe the fellow who hands President Trump the EO's & verbally summarizes the contents is White House staff secretary Will Scharf - not Stephen Miller. Miller is Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy. He's also the one who's been giving the media some quite necessary civics lessons of late (AKA what some might call quite blistering a$$-whoopings), which are quite a joy to watch. He definitely takes no prisoners!!!

God bless you Capt K! Keep the faith & your eye on the prize!

Expand full comment
Sally's avatar

Stephen Miller is awesome. Truly working for our Republic!

Expand full comment
Mark Marshall's avatar

VERY glad to see this. I was getting concerned that action on elections might be put on the back burner.

Expand full comment
Laura's avatar

What good is a citizenship question on a voter registration form? Proof of citizenship should be required.

Expand full comment
Thomas from Iowa's avatar

Who would object to free, fair and timely elections? Would the enemies within the wire please rise and self-identify?

Expand full comment
Geoff mcveigh's avatar

You risked everything for this day, Seth - thank you and all the patriots that never gave up - KEEP GOING……GM

PS - even a nobody election fraud researcher like me was cancelled, but I miraculously was granted a pardon (long story) and remain in the fight……..

Expand full comment
jesse porter's avatar

The State of Israel will oppose any change in their ability to contribute to candidates (read buy votes for our financing of their genocide against Palestinians.)

Expand full comment