Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Luthmann's avatar

Keshel’s reported figures describe two different mechanisms: genuine acquisition and administrative subtraction. Florida’s steady Republican gain after its primary points to accumulation. Nevada’s apparent Republican win came from both parties losing thousands, with Democrats losing more. That is relative advantage created by list maintenance, not persuasion. Pennsylvania adds another distinction: statewide Democratic growth concentrated in Philadelphia, surrounding counties, and Allegheny, while Erie, Monroe, and Northampton barely moved. That pattern suggests mobilization inside metropolitan coalitions rather than broad geographic realignment. The model becomes useful when it separates acquisition, switching, migration, and purge effects instead of collapsing them into one headline number.

No posts

Ready for more?