The Five Biggest 2024 Election Lies in Circulation Today

Topic: Perspective

The media prey upon those unwilling to do their own research or consider outside sources.  This is true for nearly every category out there in the battlefield of ideas, and critical to their control of the elections space.  It has become painfully clear over the past three presidential cycles exactly what the purpose of mainstream media polling is, and it is not lost on observers that polling “errors” only seem to favor one side.  Now, the media are attempting to prop up the least popular Vice President in modern history, who failed to even reach the Iowa caucus in her failed presidential campaign, and they are using a variety of lies to whisk her into the White House in a desperate sprint.

In this author’s humble opinion, there are five major lies about the Harris-Trump race that can be distinctly identified and subsequently opposed with fact and the exposure of blatantly fictitious narratives:

I.                             Mockingbird Polling

A Bloomberg/Morning Consult polling set for the swing states, released late last month, is perhaps the worst batch of work I’ve seen since the Clinton +10 or more polls flying all over in October 2016.

Oh, so you mean to tell me Trump is going to carry Pennsylvania by the largest GOP margin since 1984, but simultaneously lose Michigan by 11 points, even though Michigan and Pennsylvania are political cousins that have voted the same way in every election since 1980, and all but three times since 1932?

You expect me to believe even the internals of polls that have Trump ahead?  That Trump can be taking a quarter of the black vote, nearly splitting the Hispanic vote, winning seniors, winning suburbanites, doing better with young voters than any modern Republican, and he still may not win Arizona or Georgia?  Those of us who actually know what we are looking at realize you won’t find Iowa in the mid-double digits for Trump but Wisconsin in the Harris column.

It can’t be more obvious that this is the work of regime operatives who have cratered their own credibility for a paycheck and a spot under Kamala’s table begging for scraps.  Polling, although the errors are easier to spot, is largely publicized to condition the public to anticipate and accept any results that are foisted upon them.  Despite lies to the contrary, Democrats are not experiencing any meaningful uptick in voter registration anywhere since she was subbed in.

II.                         Harris is Likeable

My Dad, one of the more quotable people you could ever hope to meet, was fond of saying, “you can’t make chicken salad out of chicken shit.”

Harris has been in the national public eye for almost a decade, not counting her time as California’s Attorney General, and ran a presidential campaign that was absolutely annihilated in one debate exchange by a congresswoman from Hawaii.  She is a favorite subject of impersonators, and not in a flattering way like the hilarious Trump imitators perform, is known for massive staff turnover and treating employees like garbage, and with her sordid personal past aside, barely scraped by in the days before California pioneered ballot harvesting and industrial scale election fraud: