It went back to the prediction. Keshel described a negotiated expansion of American Arctic interests without requiring annexation of Greenland. The correlation with the announced security agreement is "dead-on-balls-accurate": greater American military access, with Denmark and Greenland maintaining sovereignty.
Seth expected movement in 2025 and acknowledges it took a little longer to close this one out. His forecast nevertheless identified the negotiating approach and the final destination.
Look forward to your musings...You, alone, are keeping us hopeful during this mid term election cycle....We live in Ohio, and have yet to see a positive poll for Gov and Senate....
Great forecasting. I am still concerned about the 2026 midterms so far. Follow your advice on ignoring polls, but Republican candidates indicate their districts are being flooded with Dem contributions at levels they've never seen before. The implication is that seats thought to be safe are at higher risk. Is this just money raising rhetoric or significant enough to alter our donation strategy?
It went back to the prediction. Keshel described a negotiated expansion of American Arctic interests without requiring annexation of Greenland. The correlation with the announced security agreement is "dead-on-balls-accurate": greater American military access, with Denmark and Greenland maintaining sovereignty.
https://youtu.be/zQ3KH2kr18k
Seth expected movement in 2025 and acknowledges it took a little longer to close this one out. His forecast nevertheless identified the negotiating approach and the final destination.
Look forward to your musings...You, alone, are keeping us hopeful during this mid term election cycle....We live in Ohio, and have yet to see a positive poll for Gov and Senate....
I'll make a prediction of my own: As soon as a Dumocrat wins the presidency again, they'll just give it back and say "We're sorry".
Great forecasting. I am still concerned about the 2026 midterms so far. Follow your advice on ignoring polls, but Republican candidates indicate their districts are being flooded with Dem contributions at levels they've never seen before. The implication is that seats thought to be safe are at higher risk. Is this just money raising rhetoric or significant enough to alter our donation strategy?