Potentially big news broke Saturday as the United States Postal Service provided a 95-page ruling as to how they will be handling mail-in ballots pending favorable relief from the courtroom (hence the asterisks in the title and sub-title of this article). From Reuters:
USPS said it was issuing its 95-page rule so it could take immediate effect if a court lifted its injunctions on it and be in place for the upcoming election. Under the rule, USPS would not deliver ballots in states that do not comply with the rule's new standards.
You can also find the full document at my Telegram page in a forwarded post.
The USPS cuts right to the chase and points fingers at the ridiculous courts in this country, which are doing everything they can to get in the way of communists being thrown out of power everywhere in America. From the document:
Given injunctions currently in place in State of California v. Trump, No. 26-cv-11581 (D. Mass. June 25, 2026), and League of Women Voters of Massachusetts v. Trump, No. 26-cv-11549 (D. Mass. Aug. 11, 2026), the Postal Service will not take actions to implement the rule specifically for the 2026 election unless and until the government obtains relief from those injunctions.
Essentially, the USPS tells us in the first two pages they are trying to execute the President’s executive order intended to “…reduce the risk of fraud, and help protect the integrity of federal elections.” Of course, every nation on Earth realizes the problems with mail-in balloting, which is why you can barely spin the globe without your finger landing on a nation that hasn’t already banned the practice; that is, every nation not filled with left-wing idiots jamming up the courts and praying they can threaten and blackmail themselves to some half-baked ruling from a tyrant in a robe on the enemy’s payroll that furthers their sick agendas.
This article, as I am fond of doing, will outline the Top Five Points of the USPS’s ruling for your edification and understanding:
I. Timing
The USPS is on point and getting ahead of anything new, specifically aiming these reforms with a court order in mind. The Trump administration is awaiting an emergency Supreme Court ruling on their filings pushing back against the lawsuits from states listed above. Most recently, the Supreme Court (thanks to Amy Coney Barrett) gave us the shaft by allowing states to count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day:
ACB Sends Election Integrity Back to the Stone Age
In my “Ten Bold Predictions for 2026,” released on January 1, it wasn’t all rainbows and butterflies. I had this to say about birthright citizenship, which will be addressed by the Supreme Court any day now:
It remains to be seen whether that ruling will have any impact on Trump’s USPS executive order (14399). Still, I find it promising that the USPS is bullish enough on the validity and necessity of that order to produce such a thorough document that suggests they acknowledge the vulnerabilities of the present system and the potential for fraud and abuse. Simply put, the USPS is ready and eager to implement these changes. Timing is essential, since states like Virginia and Pennsylvania will start pushing mail ballots out within the next month.